IMPORTANT NEWS
9/11: INTERCEPTED
New Release!
What happened on the morning of September 11, 2001? Why were our defenses ineffective? Pilots For 9/11 Truth analyze NORAD response, Audio recordings as well as Radar data provided by government agencies.
Click here to here to order your personal copy.
Click here for reviews.
We thank you for your support!
ACARS CONFIRMED - 9/11 AIRCRAFT AIRBORNE LONG AFTER CRASH
UNITED 175 IN THE VICINITY OF HARRISBURG AND PITTSBURGH, PA
(PilotsFor911Truth. org) - Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) is a device used to send messages to and from an aircraft. Very similar to text messages and email we use today, Air Traffic Control, the airline itself, and other airplanes can communicate with each other via this "texting" system. ACARS was developed in 1978 and is still used today. Similar to cell phone networks, the ACARS network has remote ground stations installed around the world to route messages from ATC, the airline, etc, to the aircraft depending on it's location and vice versa. ACARS Messages have been provided through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) which demonstrate that the aircraft received messages through ground stations located in Harrisburg, PA, and then later routed through a ground station in Pittsburgh, 20 minutes after the aircraft allegedly impacted the South Tower in New York. How can messages be routed through such
remote locations if the aircraft was in NY, not to mention how can messages be routed to an aircraft which allegedly crashed 20 minutes earlier? Pilots For 9/11 Truth have briefly touched on this subject in 9/11: Intercepted through the excellent research of "Woody Box", who initially discovered such alarming information in the released FOIA documents(1) . We now have further information which confirms the aircraft was not in the vicinity of New York City when the attacks occurred. read more...
Speeds Reported For World Trade Center Attack Aircraft Analyzed
For Immediate Release
Supplement to "9/11 World Trade Center Attack"
(PilotsFor911Truth. org) - Much controversy has surrounded the speeds reported for the World Trade Center attack aircraft. However, none of the arguments for either side of the debate have been properly based on actual data, until now. Pilots For 9/11 Truth have recently analyzed data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board in terms of a "Radar Data Impact Speed Study" in which the NTSB concludes 510 knots and 430 knots for United 175 (South Tower) and American 11 (North Tower), respectively. A benchmark has been set by the October 1999 crash of Egypt Air 990, a 767 which exceeded it's maximum operating limits causing in-flight structural failure, of which data is available to compare to the WTC Attack Aircraft. read more...
Pilots For 9/11 Truth Sign Affidavit In Lawsuit Brought By Pentagon Survivor
(Pilotsfor911truth. org) April Gallop, a survivor of the Pentagon Attack on September 11, 2001, is now suing Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers and other officials for their possible role in the attack and failure to evacuate the Pentagon. The lawsuit cites Flight Data Recorder Analysis. Pilots For 9/11 Truth have been called upon to sign our names and professional reputations to the analysis which will be presented before a judge in a court of law.
Full Article HERE.
United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - According To ATC/Radar
(PilotsFor911Truth. org) - Recently it has been brought to our attention that Air Traffic Control (ATC) transcripts reveal United 93 as being airborne after it's alleged crash. Similar scenarios have been offered with regard to American 77 and American 11 showing an aircraft target continuing past its alleged crash point in the case of American 11, or past the turn-around point in the case of American 77. However, both these issues can be easily explained by "Coast Mode" radar tracking. This is not the case with United 93.
Full Article Here
Pentagon Survivor April Gallop Suing Rumsfeld, Cheney, Myers
April Gallop, an Army Officer who was stationed at the Pentagon on 9/11 is now suing top govt officials for their possible role in the attack and failure to evacuate the pentagon with prior knowledge of the impending attack. In a recently published article by Raw Story, April's attorney asserts -
"The ex-G.I. plaintiff alleges she has been denied government support since then, because she raised 'painful questions' about the inexplicable failure of military defenses at the Pentagon that day, and especially the failure of officials to warn and evacuate the occupants of the building when they knew the attack was imminent" said Veale in a media advisory.
Gallop.... does not believe that a
Boeing 757 hit the building. Her son sustained a serious brain injury, and
Gallop herself was knocked unconscious after the roof collapsed onto her
office.
The suit also named additional, unknown persons who had
foreknowledge of the attacks.
"What they don't want is for this to
go into discovery," said Gallop's attorney, Mr. Veale, speaking to RAW
STORY. "If we can make it past their initial motion to dismiss these
claims, and we get the power of subpoena, then we've got a real shot at
getting to the bottom of this. We've got the law on our side."
From the complaint -
"This claim is supported by data from the plane’s supposed â€Å"black box�, released by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which indicate the plane passed over the building at very low altitude, just as an explosion and fireball were engineered by other means, a planted bomb or bombs and/or a missile."
We have contacted April offering any assistance she may need with this lawsuit.
For full article, full lawsuit complaint, as well as discussion, click here.
Japanese Senator Questions 9/11
By Alan Miller
Fujita Yukihisa made a 30 minute presentation at the House of Councillors (equivalent to the U.S. Senate). He directly questioned the official version of 9/11 in a session with Japanese Prime Minister Fukuda Yasuo and members of his Cabinet.
Fujita is a
member of the opposition party, Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). He was
elected to the House of Councillors in 2007. He is a former Member of the
House of Representative and Former Vice Director General of the
International Department of the Democratic Party of Japan.
Fujita
emphasized that there was never an official police investigation into the
deaths of the 24 Japanese citizens who were killed on 9/11.
He stated that many in the US doubt the official version of 9/11 and numerous individuals have collected evidence that contradicts the government's version, which can be seen on many websites.
During his speech, an aide showed several larges photos
of:
- the Pentagon entry and exit hole and a scale overlay of a
757
- the flight path towards the Pentagon
- the WTC Twin Towers
exploding
- the WTC 7 collapse
- the early announcment of the
collapse of WTC 7 by the BBC and CBS
He demanded further
investigation of 9/11.
added by webmaster
A Japan resident and Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum Admin writes:
"Hey folks, this is BIG. This is like, Joe Biden coming out for 9/11 Truth and doing a presentation of the evidence on the Senate floor."
Full Article, Video, and Discussion
Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11
by Alan Miller
Official Account of 9/11: â€Å"Flawed�, â€Å"Absurd�, â€Å"Totally Inadequate�, â€Å"a Cover-up�
January 5, 2008 – Eight
U.S. State Department veterans have severely criticized the official
account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation. â€Å"There is no
question in my mind, that there is enough evidence to justify a very
comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of the kind we have not seen,
with subpoenas, general questioning of people, releasing a lot of
documents,� said Daniel Ellsberg, PhD, in a 2006 interview with Jack Blood. Full Article
(Full Film)
Available on DVD in High Quality with Extras
click for your personal copy
Thank you for your support. Flight Of American 77
Chapter Two of the Pandora's Black Box Series produced and supported by Professional Pilots. This feature film follows the flight as it happens in real time throughout the Air Traffic Control System on September 11, 2001. Analysis includes The Flight Data Recorder, The money and cover-up, Air Traffic Control and Radar, NORAD response and the shocking conflicts/possibili ties based on information provided by the US Government.
National Academy of Sciences Member Calls for New 9/11 Investigation
Official Explanation a
â€Å"Fraud�
August 27, 2007 – World renowned scientist, Lynn
Margulis, Ph.D., today severely criticized the official account of 9/11
and called for a new investigation, â€Å"I suggest that those of us aware and
concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be
dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be
undertaken.� Full Article
Robert Fisk: Even I question the 'truth' about 9/11
08/25/07 - ...But – here we go. I am increasingly troubled at the inconsistencies in the official narrative of 9/11. It's not just the obvious non sequiturs: where are the aircraft parts (engines, etc) from the attack on the Pentagon? Why have the officials involved in the United 93 flight (which crashed in Pennsylvania) been muzzled? Why did flight 93's debris spread over miles when it was supposed to have crashed in one piece in a field? Again, I'm not talking about the crazed "research" of David Icke's Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster – which should send any sane man back to reading the telephone directory.
I am talking about scientific issues. If it is true, for example, that kerosene burns at 820C under optimum conditions, how come the steel beams of the twin towers – whose melting point is supposed to be about 1,480C – would snap through at the same time? (They collapsed in 8.1 and 10 seconds.) What about the third tower – the so-called World Trade Centre Building 7 (or the Salmon Brothers Building) – which collapsed in 6.6 seconds in its own footprint at 5.20pm on 11 September? Why did it so neatly fall to the ground when no aircraft had hit it? The American National Institute of Standards and Technology was instructed to analyse the cause of the destruction of all three buildings. They have not yet reported on WTC 7. Two prominent American professors of mechanical engineering – very definitely not in the "raver" bracket – are now legally challenging the terms of reference of this final report on the
grounds that it could be "fraudulent or deceptive". Full Article
Now available in High Quality and
Updated on Volume II
(click for your personal copy)
American 77 Flight Path version2 - In 3D
08/03/07 - Three Dimensional view of American 77 Flight Path according to data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Removing altitudeand NTSB northern plot data as a variable (see
http://pilotsfor911 truth.org/ pressrelease. html for more information) , we use the "impact point" as point of origin working outwards based on heading, descent angles and bank angles to analyze if the data can account for the physical damage path. Please see Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two for in depth analysis of complete data provided by US Govt Agencies who claim was generated by the aircraft which struck The Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
Could Barbara Olson Have Made Those Calls?
An Analysis of New Evidence about Onboard Phones
David Ray Griffin and Rob Balsamo
06/26/07 - Did AA 77---the flight that, according to the official conspiracy theory about 9/11, struck the Pentagon---have onboard phones? This question is relevant to the possible truth of the official theory, because Ted Olson, who was then the US Solicitor General, claimed that his wife, Barbara Olson, called him twice from this flight using an onboard phone. Full Article
Click on picture below for full size.
Cancel or edit your subscription services to the mailing list via this link:
